Skip to main content

Call from Mulgrew! Maternity/Parental Leave

Emily James and her colleague Susan Hibdon delivered their petition to Mulgrew Monday night at the UFT executive board meeting. As a result Mulgrew has been in communication with them which you can read below. Please continue to circulate the petition in your chapter and share MORE's position and Emily/Susan's position that UFT ought to negotiate a deal for family leave without any givebacks. The city has the money, they didnt pay out full retro for us like other city unions, and our union is majority women, majority caregivers. Mulgrew has promised that this fight is all our fight and we will win!
We also stand in solidarity with Emily and Susan calling for our union to openly advertise Executive Board meetings, the "open mic" option to address leadership at these meetings, more union transparency, and seek input from our members in the decision making process. Our Executive Board members will continue to be the voice of class-room teachers and school-based educators at these meetings and welcome all rank and file to join us.

SEP 30, 2017 — Spoke with Michael Mulgrew. He is emphatic that he wants to get this done. We explained it has to be done quickly, and NOT on the backs of any teachers. We will not give anything more to make this deal, we have enough on our plate already (both teachers with AND without children).

He agrees. He wants it done at NO cost to our teachers. He is now actively negotiating with the Office of Labor Relations. 

We need this done NOW! Not in some months, some years. Now! 
Keep sharing! Lets keep fighting until we have that leave policy in place.

Will be tweeting more updates this week as they come.
@missG3rd
Emily James shared an update on Michael Mulgrew: Help NYC Teachers Fight for Paid Maternity Leave Check it out and leave a comment:
PETITION UPDATE

Call from Mulgrew!

Spoke with Michael Mulgrew. He is emphatic that he wants to get this done. We explained it has to be done quickly, and NOT on the backs of any teachers. We will not give anything more to make this deal, we have enough on our plate already (both teachers with AND without children). He agrees. He wants it done at NO cost to our teachers. He is now actively negotiating with the Office of Labor...
Read full update
You signed Emily James‘s petition, “Michael Mulgrew: Help NYC Teachers Fight for Paid Maternity Leave”, on Aug 08, 2017

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Executive Board Takeaway--Being Unity Means Never Having to Say You're Sorry

First, Mulgrew said something very interesting Monday night.. He seemed to suggest that there was some workaround to the Janus decision that would come around next year being negotiated statewide. That might explain why there's all the cozying up to Cuomo and a potential endorsement. But then he said both the country and state would be right to work next year, so it was kind of a mixed message.

I sometimes have issues with what UFT Secretary Howard Schoor says but in retrospect, he said two of the most important things I heard all night. First of all, in answer to my question as to why no one got to vote on the ATR agreement, he gave the only credible and honest answer, stating they don't need no stinking votes, thank you very much. Perhaps more importantly, he unwittingly answered the question that haunted me for much of Monday night's meeting--how could so many people get up in public and say so many stupid things? I'll get to that later.

I sat for …

UFT Executive Board--Class Size Matters BUT....

 Note--I spoke in support of the Class Size resolution  and defended it when it was misrepresented from the dais with a ridiculous strawman argument. I did not take notes while I myself was speaking, and they are absent from this report. I will have much more to say about it very soon.

Secretary Howard Schoor—welcomes us, said there are no speakers.

Approval of minutes—accepted.

President’s Report—Mulgrew is not here

Staff director’s report—also not here

Question—in response to my question last week. Ellen Procida, grievance dept.—Gives background on class size—When we first negotiated there was a list of exceptions. In 1996 board was continually relying on exceptions. Argued they were becoming the rule, and now cannot be relied on for more than two terms.

Now schools can rely on them for two years, and they then have five days to come into compliance or propose an action plan. Arbitrator may find it reasonable or not.

Last year, we decided that action plans were becoming …

Forging the UFT Unity Wilderness

This school year I went to UFT Executive Board twice a month. The only one I missed was the last one, as I'm told that was some catered affair with waiters and such, in which we celebrate our achievements. I was not in a particularly celebratory mood after a year of unnecessarily adversarial episodes.

There are seven of us who represent the high schools, and 95 who ostensibly represent everyone else. We are outvoted at every turn, so it can be discouraging. I can generally shrug it off, as I am not surprised when Unity fails to display capacity for growth or change. The only time I was really quite upset was the night I brought a substantive and detailed class size resolution and they voted it down based on nonsense. However, I got over it and I doubt they will be able to shock me again unless they suddenly turn supportive.

If you've been reading my notes, the thing that most stands out is that virtually nothing would happen if we were not there. They'd probab…